Why Prematurity is like The Matrix: A post for World Prematurity Day


I wrote this post a year ago for World Prematurity Day 2013. If anything, it seems even more true to me now than it was then.

Originally posted on Premmeditations :

Do you want to know what it is? Prematurity, I mean.

This blog is, in large part, my attempt to tell you just that. And this week, the week that will conclude with World Prematurity Day on November 17th, I want to do that more than ever. I want to tell you what prematurity is.

I don’t mean technically. You probably know that prematurity is clinically defined as birth before 37 weeks gestation. You may also know that 15 million children are born too soon every year, 60,000 of which are born in the UK alone. But parents of premature babies (though, in my experience, they frequently cling to statistics) know that facts and figures don’t mean all that much when it’s your child who has been delivered in a pre-term birth. If you are quoted an 80-90 per cent survival rate for your child (as we were) and, unimaginably…

View original 642 more words

Coming together

Blogging is my sanity saver. I blog to connect with others and as therapy. I blog to work through my irrational guilt over Boo’s premature birth and disabilities.

But sometimes blogging compounds the sense of guilt I can never give up on. Partly it’s because I feel guilty stealing moments of the day to do this when I could be doing more work, making flashcards, sourcing equipment, or reading about surgeries and therapies. Partly it’s because I feel I dump too much here. This is, frankly, the only place you get the real me. The warts and all how-I-feel-about-life me. It’s a place where I can say the things I can’t, won’t or don’t say elsewhere and, inevitably, that means it can be balanced more in favour of the stresses, the battles, the stuff that stops me sleeping at night. The me who has to fend off depression and anxiety.

And that me, I worry, from this blog’s readers point of view, must seem terribly embattled. That me, I worry, might seem like someone who whines and complains a lot. Well, I guess I do and am these things. But outside the blog that me is tempered by my sense of pride in Boo and his amazing big sister, by my incredible capacity for self-censorship, by the fact that I want and often am an extremely happy person.

And that me is not separate from special needs parents me. Special needs parent me finds joys in life that I couldn’t have dreamed of before having Boo. I know this will sound horribly trite, but it’s true: I have an appreciation for life, for the amazing capacity of human beings and their bodies and minds that I just didn’t have pre-Boo. I have also met the most wonderful children and parents in the past 2 years, people who should really write in to the OED and tell them what hope, tenacity and determination really mean.

One thing I particularly worry about is that people who read this blog might think reading all my posts about battles for equipment and services and therapies is that I am not grateful for all we have: the stuff without which our difficult lives would be impossible and the interventions that have already made such a difference to what Boo’s life and what it will be like in the future.

And today I was reminded about how incredibly grateful I am for many of the professionals involved in Boo’s life. The people who care, love and hope for him alongside us. Because these people do exist.

A few moments ago, I was surrounded by three of them. I went into Boo’s nursery for a joint OT-physio-moving and handling appointment. Joint appointments are the holy grail of special needs life. They are like gold dust. Boy, do they make a difference. Joined up thinking. Linked services. If only they could happen more often.

Of course, I was really worried about the appointment beforehand. Nursery are clearly and understandably worried about managing their own health while looking after a largely non-independently mobile Boo. I knew pre-meeting conversations had included the words ‘hoist’ (not a bad thing, but Boo can do seated transfers so I wasn’t sure we need them… yet). I was worried it was going to be another ‘we love Boo, but it is a pain having him here’ conversation.

And I knew Boo would be far from his best in the appointment. We are now more than 2 weeks into Boo’s non-lycra suit period while they adjust it for growth. The difference between him in it and out of it is totally staggering. He is a different child. No aspect of his life (except his smile and even that is waning) is the same without it. He dribbles constantly and has a terrible rash. He can’t speak as well. His head control is compromised. He can no longer sit even for the few minutes he could manage before. He cannot use his walker or Whizzybug. This appointment was going to be tough.

I gave myself a good talking to before I went. His lovely physio said it was a good thing that moving and handling were seeing Boo at his worst as it would ensure maximum support. I smiled as my heart sank.

But the moving and handling advisor was a breath of fresh air. She looked at Boo. She watched him closely. She saw how he reacted to conversations around him. She could see he has great understanding. She listened to what we said he could do, even if he couldn’t achieve this easily without the lycra suit. I didn’t feel, as I often do, that I had to persuade her to see Boo as I do. She got him pegged in about 10 minutes.

No problem or issue that was discussed fazed her. She had solutions (practical and easy) to address each one. And she kept repeating the same sentiment. Boo is a bright child. He is motivated and wants to be as independent as possible. We need to use every opportunity to help him achieve that. There is no need for a hoist yet. He needed to be doing seated and active transfers throughout the day, each one of them helping to make him stronger and more in control of the world around him.

Few appointments I have been to in the last 2.5 years have been so positive (and there have been hundreds and hundreds of appointments, I kid you not, in that time). At one point as the three professionals talked amongst themselves while I played with Boo I had to tell myself not to cry. Not through the tiredness and frustration that often gets me down but in recognition that these three talented and caring women were talking not about what my little boy can’t do but all that he can and will. They talked about his determination and his many physical and mental strengths. And they had all come together to help him achieve that.

I can’t quite put into words the gratitude I felt in that moment. That people want to help. That people can see Boo as we do. That they don’t see obstacles but hurdles that can all be gotten over or around one way or another.

I couldn’t let this moment pass without recording it here. Partly because few days are like this and I can see many others in the future where I will need to remind myself of this one. And also because I want to tell all of you what I sometimes forget to say.

You know, Boo’s early arrival and complicated life since has taught me many things: humility; patience; that I have hidden reserves of energy and determination. It has also taught me gratitude for him, for those that helped him survive and continue to help him thrive. It’s a gratitude more profound than I ever thought it possible to feel and runs just as deep as any misplaced guilt I feel.

Frankenstein and other demons

I went out last week. Hang on, I’ll say that again. I went out! A night out to celebrate a good friend’s birthday with some other very good friends I see all too infrequently. I was driving so not drinking (probably for the best – you’ll see why), but I was out. After dark. People do this. I’d almost forgotten.

Friends and a film. What more can you ask for? And not just any film. We were going to see, very belatedly, Danny Boyle’s NT production of Frankenstein with Benedict Cumberbatch as the creature and Jonny Lee Miller as Frankenstein. Two actors I like a lot. A director I admire hugely. A novel I love and know backwards, forwards, and inside out. And good company to share popcorn with. What could go wrong?

People. People went wrong. And I haven’t felt right since.

The screening began with a very short documentary on the making of the production. Most people seemed uninterested in it and for most of it I was too busy dealing with texts from home about the location of grobags and sterilised syringes to take much notice.

But my ears pricked up suddenly when I heard Cumberbatch talking about stroke patients and watching as many videos as he could of their recovery to try to figure out how to convey the birth of Mary Shelley’s creature: a man who through the accident of his creation has a brain and a body that aren’t wired up as they should be.

I felt a hot stab of pain run through my chest as he spoke. He was talking about neurorehabilitation. He was talking about intensive physiotherapy. He was talking about the impact of neurological damage on gross and fine motor function. He said stroke survivors, I thought cerebral palsy. Did you know many people with CP had a stroke before, during or shortly after labour? Boo didn’t, but I knew that what Cumberbatch was trying to do with his creature would strike very close to home. I worried I wouldn’t be able to deal with it. I’m not sure I did.

He was going to be on stage what Boo is in life: a person not entirely in control of his own body. And he would be doing this in the context of a fictional world where he (nameless, and known only as the creature, an ogre or ugly man) is considered monstrous. And that would be hard for me to see.

That’s the point of course. And Cumberbatch spoke directly and eloquently about this in the brief documentary. He wanted to convey through this intensive research the profound physical and emotional vulnerability of this man. For my money, he did. Brilliantly.

If you’ve seen the show or the filmed version you won’t have forgotten the first 10 minutes or so. It is a scene that is unrecognisable from the book, in which the creature is galvanised and shunned by his creator in a heartbeat. This was different. Ten long, extraordinary minutes where the creature emerges from an artificial embryo and writhes, dystonically around the stage on his back, front and eventually on his legs, battling his body at every turn, its spasms and the natural patterns of movement that you and I learned to overcome in baby and toddlerhood. It was remarkable. I saw dystonia. I saw hyperextension. I saw movements, jolts and shakes that anyone who knows someone who lives with CP would recognise. It was extreme. It was one of the most viscerally affecting things I have ever seen. Boy he’d done his research and executed it extraordinarily.

It was supposed to be hard to watch, of course. And it was. Really, really hard. But for me it was hard in ways I bet it wasn’t for most of the people in the audience. I sat there digging my nails into my palms so that I didn’t cry. I didn’t know the two people sat next to me at all well. I couldn’t let them hear me cry. And I’m not sure they’d have understood why I was sobbing anyway. You see, I wasn’t choking back tears because of what I was seeing. It was what I heard that hurt.

Laughter. Lots of laughter.

Now, I’ve been somewhere like this before when I saw The Cripple of Inishmaan, starring Daniel Radcliffe, last year. That was both great and hard to watch, too. But that was a comedy. Frankenstein is not, nor did Boyle intend it to be. And people were laughing. Hard.

Now, you might say (and I can see the truth in this) that people were laughing at the creature because they felt uncomfortable. All those teenage girls in the audience who were there to see the man they know best as Sherlock probably did feel uncomfortable seeing their heartthrob look and behave physically so out of character. But they laughed also at a sight they clearly found humorous. A grown man moving around like an uncoordinated toddler.

I have never ever been so relieved to get to end of a scene as I was to get to the end of that one. I thought it would be OK after that. But if anything, it got worse. One of the hardest things to convey in any adaptation of Frankenstein must be the creature’s acquisition of language, which comes about rather improbably in the novel itself. This adaptation did things a bit differently from the novel and lost something as a result, but it worked well enough. And again Cumberbatch was just brilliant. His speech reminded me of Boo’s. The high tone he affected in his mouth and tongue made his speech sounds indistinct and child-like. The dissonance between his manner of speech and its content (the creature can quote epic poetry and ancient philosophy) was supposed to startle the audience just like it does in the novel. But I can’t help but think it wasn’t supposed to make you laugh. And people did laugh at him. A lot.

Believe me, I do still have a sense of humour. I really do. But this was not funny. This was about that vulnerability spoken about in the documentary. About how the way that someone looks or sounds overrides what they know and who they are.

This creature was vulnerable not because some mad scientist made him wrongly. He was vulnerable because the world is full of people who are innocent or ignorant, personally insecure or prejudiced or just downright cruel.

If making audience members aware of their own complicity in these forms of prejudice was part of the point of Danny Boyle’s production then it was a point not lost on me. But I worry that those who needed to hear that message most might not have.

Because my work takes me into the past a lot, I often thank our lucky stars that Boo was born in the 2010s, with the wonders of modern medicine (without which we both would have died), modern technologies and disability legislation. But what Frankenstein showed me was that when it comes to prejudice, the past is still with very much with us.

Perhaps you will think I’m being unfair or high-handed. Perhaps you’ll think I’m overreacting. Maybe I am. All I can say is that this production of Frankenstein was as much a revelation to me as the novel was when I first read it at the age of 15. There were bits of the script that I thought were weak. There were bits left out of the original novel that I thought the play really needed to make full sense. But the performances, particularly Cumberbatch’s and Miller’s, were astonishing and worth all the accolades they got. The direction was superb and the play hit its mark.

But I left ever more convinced of something I see and feel every single day of Boo’s life. Physical and neurological difference don’t make people vulnerable. People make other people vulnerable. And people can be bloody horrible.

RSV and the Silly Season


For this week’s Throwback Thursday and the beginning of the month which sees us mark World Prematurity Day here’s a post about a subject very dear to my heart. RSV are three letters I hadn’t ever put together before’s birth, although I had likely had it and passed it on to others. This nasty virus has probably affected you and you barely knew it. But it could seriously harm vulnerable children like Boo. In December 2012, it put him back in hospital (where he caught it from, ironically) and nearly put him back on ventilation. And all because people don’t wash their hands properly or commit to basic hygiene. Please, please, read and share this post. Let’s try to prevent kids getting really sick this year by taking a few simple steps. It’s very easy. It’d be silly not to.

Originally posted on Premmeditations :


It’s the silly season: Halloween, bonfire night and Christmas are all upon us. And with that comes about 1000 requests a day (more or less) from Sissyboo’s school for gifts, cakes, volunteering, costumes and … oh I can’t finish the sentence because I feel queasy now.

It’s also cold and flu season. More to the point for former premmies and medically compromised kids like Boo, it’s RSV season. Until March next year. That’s right people. Until March.

RSV… I’ve said before that after having Boo I entered by own private hell of acronyms. In the NICU (acronym #1) I had to learn about the dangers of NEC and CLD, the problems that can attend NG feeding and the TPN that can help to alleviate them. Then we experienced the horrors of IVHs and the CP and IS they led to.

When we finally got Boo home, though, the one acronym…

View original 1,491 more words

Whizzing around in the Wizzybug

A lot of my posts recently have been about the various fires we’re trying to put out here in Boo land. The statementing debacle. The temporary halt put on our front access adaptations. The struggle to secure equipment. The last few months have been utterly exhausting. But there have been lots of good things going on, too. And today I’m finally getting round to telling you about one of the very best.

The Wizzybug. Is it a wheelchair? Is it the funkiest toy car you have ever seen? Is it just about one of the most fun and life enhancing things anyone has ever invented? The answer is yes to all of these things. Take a look and judge for yourself.


I heard about the Wizzybug in the spring from my lovely friend in the know over at Tough Little Cookies. To be honest, it sounded too good to be true.

The Wizzybug is a paediatric powered chair for children between the ages of 18 months and around 5 (depending on growth) designed by the incredibly smart people at Designability in Bath.

The NHS generally doesn’t fund powered chairs for kids under 5. Boo has an adapted buggy from wheelchair services, but of course he can only go in this where we push him and at the age of 2.5 that’s not much fun. And frankly, it’s not very forward thinking either. I will never give up on Boo walking some of the time but, realistically, he will be a chair user for some if not all of the day for the rest of his life. The idea of putting him in a powered chair for the first time at the age of 5 seems nonsensical to me.

Everything we know about cerebral palsy tells us that early intervention in developing gross and fine motor skills is essential. For Boo to achieve anything like typical patterns of movement in his terribly stiff arms and slightly less stiff legs, we have to rewire his brain around the extensive damage he sustained shortly after birth. All his therapies are designed, through repetition and other means, to help lay down new neural pathways to help him achieve or get nearer to the kind of limb function you or I have. Putting a 5 year old who can’t control his arms properly into an electric chair at the age of 5, right when he is starting school, would be like putting  a 17 year old in a Le Mans car in kids’ playground. We can all see where that story would end.

So the Wizzybug seemed perfect for Boo. Something positive and fun we could start using now with a view to preparing him for the future.

But equipment is always a nightmare to get hold of. Everything takes forever to secure. You have to beg and plead to get things…

Not the Wizzybug. My friend sent me a link to their webpage which explained their charitable loan scheme. For a returnable bond of £200, and subject to our physio’s or OT’s support in the form of a letter, we could get a Wizzbug for Boo until he grew out of it. Like I said, too good to be true…

Except it isn’t.

We sent off the paperwork and within a matter of weeks were told our application was successful. Boo would be getting a Wizzybug. A few weeks later I went to Kidz South and he tried one out. He loved it and put a smile on everyone’s face, even the conference goers he was trying to run over with alarming enthusiasm.

Within a few months, Boo and I made the trip up to Bath to be fitted for the Wizzybug (or Ug-Ug as he calls it) and we brought it home.

I confess I was a bit nervous about the fitting before it happened. What if they didn’t think he was a suitable candidate once he got in it? What if he couldn’t use it?

I needn’t have worried. The meeting with Nina, an OT for Designability and Martin, one of its engineers, was terrific. And Boo had a ball. The Wizzybug supports Boo brilliantly. We have various bits of very supportive postural seating for Boo at home, much of which looks pretty industrial, so I was a bit sceptical that the Wizzybug could do all it needed to to keep the man with the marshmallow trunk upright. But it does. The harness is almost identical to the one on his buggy, the thoracic supports do their job, and the ankle restraints keep him in that 90/90/90 position we have become slightly obsessed with.

The main challenge for Boo is the joystick. And this is a big part of why we wanted the chair so much: to get him working on using one now as this is never going to be easy for him. For many children with CP who have reasonable to good hand and arm function, this would be a piece of cake. But for Boo who has really tight arms, which often contract before he is able to reach forward, it really isn’t. Martin and Nina spent a good 20 minutes looking at this, adjusting the angle of the joystick by moving the armrest and putting a ball joystick on rather than a stick. The challenges haven’t gone, but they have been significantly reduced.

Boo spent the entirety of the fitting whizzing round in circles (I am assured every child does this), squealing with delight and increasingly going forwards and backwards. I had tears in my eyes and a lump in my throat.

Independent movement. It’s what I want most in the world for Boo. Once upon a time I was fixed on achieving this through crawling and walking. Like I say, I haven’t given up on these things, but powered movement is just as exciting and liberating. The Wizzybug is starting to transform Boo’s experience of the world and it is a joy to see.

We left Bath after a very helpful demo on how the chair works, how to work the parental controls, how to dismantle and reassemble it for moving up and down stairs (it is heavy) and armed with lots of practical hints and tips. We left with me slightly worried I wouldn’t remember it all (I did – it’s really easy to use and the manuals tell you all you need to know anyway), but also on a real high and still in disbelief that the process had not only been so smooth but also completely enjoyable.

The Ug-ug now enjoys pride of place in our dining room, parked next to the sofa. The Boos have covered it in stickers (we were told we could) and we get it out 3-4 times a week. Because we have steps up to our front door and are still awaiting a much needed lift, we haven’t taken it outside yet as much as I’d have liked, but we’re getting there. And in any case, going round the living room is just as exciting for Boo.

For him, the joystick is still a challenge. He often doesn’t go where he wants to first or second or even fifth time round. But he is getting better at using it each and every time he tries it. His spatial awareness is improving. We are using simple commands like ‘push forward’ and ‘pull back’ and you can tell he knows what they mean. He is slowly learning to override the wappy signals (that’s totally a medical term) his brain sends him in order that he can do what he wants to do.

And that’s what the Wizzybug is all about. A glimpse of independence for a little boy whose life is otherwise largely dictated by his body and other people. Boo spends every minute in the Wizzybug hollering in delight and yelling ‘more’ or ‘go’. He gets to touch leaves in the park and books on the bookshelf in our living room. And one day, I hope he will be able to drive himself to the park with us following him. I can’t think of anything I want more in the world, actually.

So thank you, thank you, thank you, Designability for the Wizzybug and for their fundraisers who work so hard to make this life-changing product available and affordable for families like us. If you’d like to know more about the Wizzybug, or how you can support Designability’s work, please visit their website. And I promise to keep you all updated with Boo’s adventures in the amazing Ug-Ug.

Fighting Talk

On Saturday, like every Saturday, I took Boo swimming. It is one of the highlights of my week. He’s such a water baby and to see the incredible joy he has doing things in the water that he can’t do on dry land is just … well … so amazing words fail me. But this Saturday, I wasn’t so excited.

You see we were with a different group of kids and parents for the new class term. Boo is at the limits of what he can do in this mainstream class, which now involves diving off the side and running on a float. So we can’t yet move any further forward. I suspect we’re at the end of the line of these lessons. I mean, Boo can’t even sit on the side safely. But his teacher is brill and we adapt things. We decided to repeat the level we have just done with a new set of parents. Boo wouldn’t care he was repeating and it would be good for him.

But I was dreading it. There would be the looks from parents who didn’t yet know him. The explaining to do about why my little boy can’t stand. The questions to answer. The ‘what’s wrong with hims’.

We had some curious, if well meaning, looks throughout the class, but it went fine. As we were getting ourselves dry afterwards a parent asked if we were new to the class (clearly her way into finding out what Boo was all about, I think). She was nice and I just explained why were we repeating the level. I told her that Boo loved swimming and since there’s no hydro in our area and no special needs classes for kids his age locally we were sticking with mainstream lessons as long as we could get away with it.

The another Mum joined in. There was something about the way she spoke to me that made me understand that she lived in or on the periphery of our special needs world. You can always tell. She was confident in our company; she looked at Boo unfazed. Either she knew a child with additional needs well or worked with them. I just knew. Thirty seconds later all was revealed when she said she was an Educational Psychologist (or EP to those of us who live in this world of SEN acronyms). She was infuriated that Boo doesn’t get hydro. In her area, just over the border, she explained, Boo would.

And then she tried to spur me on. ‘This is just wrong. But it is about Boo’s needs you know. If the NHS doesn’t fund hydro in your area, then you should fight them. If your physio supports you, get her to write on your behalf to force them to provide access to a private pool. It’s discrimination. Honestly, the parents who fight the hardest and shout the loudest get the most for their kids.’

If I’d had a pound for every time someone had said this to me since Boo’s birth…

Of course I’ve looked into ways of accessing hydrotherapy. And of course his physio supports us and would testify to the benefits for Boo. But he furthest I’ve gotten in pursuing this is to be given the number of a private physio who charges an eye watering per hour fee for hydro once a month (and we pay a small fortune for swim lessons now, let me tell you).

I thanked the EP for her advice and support and explained that I would get onto it, but that we were fighting two other big battles at the moment (statementing and social services over house adaptations) so it wasn’t at the top of the list. She understood. She knew how hard it was. ‘But keep fighting’, she said.

I left feeling grateful for the kindness of strangers.

And sad. Really, really sad. I tried to work out why and think I now have.

You see, I realise that I have had it with the fighting talk. Absolutely totally and utterly had it. Don’t get me wrong, we have had to fight for virtually everything for Boo: to get onto waiting lists; to get Boo off them to actually see someone; for virtually every piece of equipment he has, including his Bee seat (that fight nearly broke me) and his adapted buggy; to get him 1:1 support in nursery; even down to getting a bloody pair of Piedro boots. I could go on.

Of course, we’re not alone in this. You need only look at the special needs equipment online forums to see how hard people have to try and how much money they have to save to buy even the basics in our children’s lives. These forums are totally great – I use them a lot myself and have bought lots of essential kit for Boo from them second hand. But they are also incredibly frustrating and occasionally downright uncivil.

Here’s a common scenario. Parent A at the end of their tether waiting for something they have been told is essential for their child’s health and happiness asks if anyone has one to sell on said forum. People jump in and say no but express sympathy with Parent A for the ridiculousness of their predicament. Then Parent B jumps in and points out, in the spirit of helpfulness, that Social Services or their PCT should provide this equipment free of charge. Of course Parent A knows this and has already exhausted all lines of enquiry. Parent A explains this. Then Parent C comes in and says Parent A should fight harder. They should make them get it for their child. Parent A either answers back that their LA or PCT doesn’t work like that or silently crumbles.

Because you know what? There is NOTHING national about the National Health Service. And you cannot emphasise the LOCAL in Local Authority enough.

Now I know everyone is trying to be helpful, but I wonder if we are, really. Of course, we are parents. Of course, we would do anything for our kids. Heck, in my darkest moments with Boo, when we didn’t know if he would survive or not, I begged any god that would listen to let me die if he would only live. Of course, we will fight for them. But is this fighting talk helpful?

I remember talking about something similar (although in other ways very different) with a friend who had a close relative in the advanced stages of cancer. She hated the fighting talk too. Her relative would not win this particular fight. That didn’t mean she wasn’t the most poised and determined of women. That she didn’t cope with her appalling situation with a courage I don’t know that I could ever possess.

Here’s the truth: the language of fighting turns us into winners and losers, because that’s how fights go. This cannot be right. Surely, we are in this together.

What if you can’t persuade the LA to support your child in nursery? What if you can’t get them to buy your child Piedro boots? Are you a bad parent? Is it just that you haven’t fought as hard as everyone else? Of course not!

And you know what really gets me? What really, really gets me? It’s that we have all internalised this language of fighting so much, become so embattled in our special needs world that we accept it. This is as true for me as anyone else. My last post about our statementing debacle was called ‘Let Battle Commence’.

Today I want to look at things differently. Today I want to ask: what is so wrong with this world that simply tending to the need of some of society’s most vulnerable people has become a battleground?

The minute we start using the language of fights and battles we become part of the problem, turning our lives into a survival of the fittest (for fittest read: most vocal, most persuasive, most legally minded, most litigious, most desperate) parents for the sake of our kids. This cannot be right. Can it?

But I fear it cannot be undone either. I wrote this post because I feel I’m done with fighting (I’ve always preferred the more American sounding word advocating anyway). Because I am battle weary. But I can’t let Boo down. I have to press on and charge ahead. And the minute I stop writing this post, I have to write a covering letter to our Local Authority about Boo’s draft statement, which will quote case law and the Equalities Act and which will be laden with fighting talk.

And you know what? I hate it. I wish things were different. I wish I knew what to do about it. I suppose the only thing we can do is make sure that our battles with systems don’t force us to battle with other parents like ourselves.

Each battle for every one of our kids has to been as a battle for them all. Otherwise, what price victory?

Making a draft statement: let battle commence

And so, finally, it arrived. The draft statement. The piece of paper I have been looking for on the doormat for a week is here. I got back from work at 7 last night and it was on my desk waiting for me.

I knew I didn’t have time to read it properly, but I just had to know had we got more 1:1 for Boo. Had we got what he needs? I was prepared for it not to have as much as we’d like, but I expected more. Everyone involved in his care and at his nursery knows that this is what he needs.

But of course, we didn’t get what he needs. What we got instead was a copy and pasted, poorly constructed document that is so drafty you can probably feel the gale blowing even if you are reading this in Scotland. (I am in the South East in a LA authority which shall, for now, remain nameless, although that will change at some point, I’m sure.) There is, in fact, no mention of quantified 1:1 support anywhere in Boo’s draft statement although the phrase is littered in the appendices that health professionals wrote.

The draft statement commits the LA to nothing. Boo’s needs, many and complex as they are, are mostly documented in part 2, but provision is not matched to these needs and is only quantified once. Once! Apparently, he needs 6 OT visits and one review. A year? A month? A term? Can you not see what my 6-year-old could? That this is important information. That this sentence of the statement is utterly meaningless without a specified timeframe.

I then look closer. There is no mention of flat-level access. Boo is a child with no indepdendent mobility who will be a wheelchair user (as documented in the statement) and in the facilities section of the document there is no mention of flat-level access or to an accessible changing area/toilet. No mention, as several appendices make clear, that he cannot feed or drink on his own. That his drinking, especially, has to be carefully supervised?

Who wrote this statement? This is the worst cut and paste job in history. You know the story about monkey with typewriters, who, given long enough, could write the complete works of Shakespeare. Apparently the same isn’t true of this particular statement writer.

So I phoned his case worker. A very nice, competent professional. She explained why the lack of quantification might be there: because it isn’t in the reports completed by the professionals (they, incidentlly, are actually not asked to quantify it in those terms, as two have pointed out to me today); or because the LA has in mind a specialist setting for Boo (one I know none of the healthcare professionals involved in Boo’s care or we feel is suitable for him) where therapy is delivered on site (although actually, it still should be quantified even if they ahev that setting in mind, you know lovely LA).

And then came the worst news of all. I was also told categorically that we will never get more than 15 hours 1:1 support for our son until he is 5. I was told, somewhat condescendingly, that we had started this process rather early. I in turn reminded her that statements and new EHCP start from 0. It’s clear what the LA thinks: I need to stop work to look after my son. He needs to be in nursery the bare mininum of time. Never mind the huge benefits (social, developmental, cognitive) to him being in an educational setting. Never mind that we know children, 3 of them very well, in 3 other LAs in the South East who have complex disabilities (2 with CP) and in in mainstream nursery who get 26 hours of teaching assistant support via a statement so that their children can access the EYFS curriculum. That’s not how our LA does it, apparently.

I hate the phrase postcode lottery. I hate the reality even more.

And so now we enter the negotation phase. We have to write the statement for them. Do their job for them. We have to take all the info they forgot to cut and paste in the appendices and add it in (cause you know, we are tripping over time as parents of a disabled child). We have to quantify things for them. And they will consider our recommendations and judging by the conversation with the case worker, they will surely reject them.

We are headed for tribunal. I know it. I have recommendations for excellent solicitors with proven track records, but this will cost us more than £10,000. I know there are legal aid options. I also don’t know any that have been successful.

We are trapped, locked into a battle with the place we live. I wish we didn’t live there. I wish we didn’t live in the LA with such an appalling reputation when it comes to SEN provision. What can we do? Move? Leave my job? Lose our home? I feel trapped.

I haven’t slept properly in days because Boo isn’t sleeping either at the moment. I am so overstretched at work that I cannot cope. I am typing this in my office in floods of tears, hoping no colleague knocks on my door. I can see depression or worse beckoning me. I am going to crash. Just at the time I most need to help Boo. I can’t crash. Not until we’ve got him what he needs, at least.

I knew this would happen, but it doesn’t make it any easier to accept. I have never wished Boo was different. But right now I wish that almost everything about our lives was, most of all where we live.

You are crippling us local authority. You are destroying a family, our health and our happiness. And most of all, you are failing in your responsibility for a young, vulnerable child. I hope you can sleep easily at night.

I know I can’t.